Personal campus education Website Mockup

Course Grids and Two-Row Profiles Need Careful Screen-Size Review

The full-width photographic hero should be reviewed first as a responsive presentation because its overlaid campus copy depends on the relationship between image scale, text width, and dark background detail. The three feature columns and three course cards then introduce repeated horizontal content, where narrower screens may change the balance between image, label, and description. Their compact spacing makes the transition from desktop presentation to smaller viewports especially important to inspect.

The four teacher profiles create a denser responsive area because portraits, names, roles, descriptions, and social links are arranged across two rows. Review should focus on whether each profile remains distinct when columns narrow and whether the text retains a clear relationship with its portrait. The four metric columns provide another useful checkpoint: the dark band should preserve readable values without becoming crowded. The three editorial columns may also require attention because article headings, quotation content, and images can produce uneven vertical lengths on smaller screens.

Finally, the five logo marks form a low-height strip whose spacing and scale should remain visually balanced. These observations concern presentation and evaluation, not a claim that the design is a wireframe or that responsive adjustments have already been made. The mockup value comes from identifying the image, density, typography, and alignment changes that deserve visual review across screen conditions.