Ch3vr0n
posted this
11 November 2021
Etorres,
you're full of hot air and self endulgance.
Let me break your post down a little
Kind regards, satisfaction survey, a negative point, Nicepace continues to provide updates, without including the requirements or requests made by its users, for an eternal solution, which they do not meet at the end, they are mandatory, priority requirements and demanded by users , which have more than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 months, up to more than 1 year, which means, the developers of Nicepage, continue to ignore the demands of users.
That is an incredibly long, hard to read sentence and makes no sense at all. First of there's a free trial, users buy a license BASED ON THE PRODUCT AS IT IS. Any improvement / feature request made by users, is exactly that. A REQUEST, developers are under NO OBLIGATION AT ALL to implement any of them. NONE OF THEM ARE MANDATORY or priority.
It is necessary and urgent that all Nicepage users should proceed against Nicepage, to force them to comply with their responsibility,
So you're going to pay for the legal fees then, besides we have no basis.
since users made a large investment in the purchase of this software,
And how do you know what any user defines as "large investment" or what the type of license they have is. You don't.
receiving an application with many errors and errors. malfunction, (notorious and truthful evidence, demonstrated in the history of the Nicepage forum, which adds up to hundreds of complaints and claims, in daily mode to the present) As they also ignore the wish lists, they continue to fail to comply with the requests of their customers. They have not realized the dimension of the problems that its application has, and the complaints and claims continue to grow daily, and even so they continue to ignore it.
That's the only partially correct part so far, you fail to keep in mind though that NO PROGRAM IS EVER BUG FREE, hell even windows itself is receiving constant updates due to , guess what.... bugs. I'll agree that there is a lot of room for improvement, but in majority it does work. And yes, instead of adding constant "useless" new blocks they should start adding things they put on their "wishlist", that list has got to be a dozen pages long by now. But again, they're REQUESTS, the developers are under no obligation to add any of them.
For my part, it is the last warning that is reflected in this forum. Either they solve all the requests and wish lists at once
That is physically impossible. One cannot simply implement EVERYTHING AT ONCE. That would likely mean no updates (of any kind) FOR MONTHS and i bet you'd be the first to complain about "how come there are no updates"? Well you would be the cause because you wanted them to add everything in 1 update? Then there's code review, internal testing before a new version is published
or we will proceed legally, in the face of the damages they have caused us. Thanks.
Speak for yourself only please! You have no grounds to speak on my behalf or any user's, not unless you're going to pay for the legal fees in this "legal action" you claim you're going to undertake. I'm not saying i'm satisfied with the way they handle things, far from it, support can use a pretty decent review/upgrade. But you're nog going to speak in my name. I wont have it.
Etorres,
you're full of hot air and self endulgance.
Let me break your post down a little
> Kind regards, satisfaction survey, a negative point, Nicepace continues to provide updates, without including the requirements or requests made by its users, for an eternal solution, which they do not meet at the end, they are mandatory, priority requirements and demanded by users , which have more than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 months, up to more than 1 year, which means, the developers of Nicepage, continue to ignore the demands of users.
That is an incredibly long, hard to read sentence and makes no sense at all. First of there's a free trial, users buy a license BASED ON THE PRODUCT AS IT IS. Any improvement / feature request made by users, is exactly that. A REQUEST, developers are under NO OBLIGATION AT ALL to implement any of them. NONE OF THEM ARE MANDATORY or priority.
> It is necessary and urgent that all Nicepage users should proceed against Nicepage, to force them to comply with their responsibility,
So you're going to pay for the legal fees then, besides we have no basis.
> since users made a large investment in the purchase of this software,
And how do you know what any user defines as "large investment" or what the type of license they have is. You don't.
> receiving an application with many errors and errors. malfunction, (notorious and truthful evidence, demonstrated in the history of the Nicepage forum, which adds up to hundreds of complaints and claims, in daily mode to the present) As they also ignore the wish lists, they continue to fail to comply with the requests of their customers. They have not realized the dimension of the problems that its application has, and the complaints and claims continue to grow daily, and even so they continue to ignore it.
That's the only partially correct part so far, you fail to keep in mind though that NO PROGRAM IS EVER BUG FREE, hell even windows itself is receiving constant updates due to , guess what.... bugs. I'll agree that there is a lot of room for improvement, but in majority it does work. And yes, instead of adding constant "useless" new blocks they should start adding things they put on their "wishlist", that list has got to be a dozen pages long by now. But again, they're REQUESTS, the developers are under no obligation to add any of them.
> For my part, it is the last warning that is reflected in this forum. Either they solve all the requests and wish lists at once
That is physically impossible. One cannot simply implement EVERYTHING AT ONCE. That would likely mean no updates (of any kind) FOR MONTHS and i bet you'd be the first to complain about "how come there are no updates"? Well you would be the cause because you wanted them to add everything in 1 update? Then there's code review, internal testing before a new version is published
> or **we will proceed legally**, in the face of the damages they have caused us. Thanks.
Speak for yourself only please! You have no grounds to speak on my behalf or any user's, not unless you're going to pay for the legal fees in this "legal action" you claim you're going to undertake. I'm not saying i'm satisfied with the way they handle things, far from it, support can use a pretty decent review/upgrade. But you're nog going to speak in my name. I wont have it.