nils.riga
posted this
19 February 2022
1 MB for 5 html pages is not worth to go static websites. Cool prog though.
But on the other hand it pays off, the more pages and images you have. But I'd say that's only for 200 pages roughly, to reach the level of 10kb max, for 5 html pages, equivalent.
But nonetheless, a cool prog. Given that the html is perfect and the gui is perfect. Your just missing some sort of an integration with vscode for example. Now that would be cool. Static (lightweight mind you) website builder with realtime integration with vscode. So that if I implement extra code I don't have to re implement it every time I make a visual change. Not even that (that also, of course, as, if I would stick to you marvelous generator, I would need to write up some code for the workflow). But not even that. It's those pesky few megabites. My inner programmer forbids me to call that acceptable. Because in my mind I imagine that implementing webpack or other minifying solution should not be so impossible. (of course, minding that a user would like to add extra code (like a javascript framework, to use some obscure plugins) )
Don't get me wrong - this is a truthful encouragement from the heart, because I Really liked your program. I mean it's perfect except for the very large files, and no clear way how could I implement extra code. Because I know how to code. So I would love if your project could be all encompassing swiss army knife for all things fronted, forever. It worked soo smooth. (i guess it was compiled and minified ;)
> 1 MB for 5 html pages is not worth to go static websites. Cool prog though.
But on the other hand it pays off, the more pages and images you have. But I'd say that's only for 200 pages roughly, to reach the level of 10kb max, for 5 html pages, equivalent.
But nonetheless, a cool prog. Given that the html is perfect and the gui is perfect. Your just missing some sort of an integration with vscode for example. Now that would be cool. Static (lightweight mind you) website builder with realtime integration with vscode. So that if I implement extra code I don't have to re implement it every time I make a visual change. Not even that (that also, of course, as, if I would stick to you marvelous generator, I would need to write up some code for the workflow). But not even that. It's those pesky few megabites. My inner programmer forbids me to call that acceptable. Because in my mind I imagine that implementing webpack or other minifying solution should not be so impossible. (of course, minding that a user would like to add extra code (like a javascript framework, to use some obscure plugins) )
Don't get me wrong - this is a truthful encouragement from the heart, because I Really liked your program. I mean it's perfect except for the very large files, and no clear way how could I implement extra code. Because I know how to code. So I would love if your project could be all encompassing swiss army knife for all things fronted, forever. It worked soo smooth. (i guess it was compiled and minified ;)
