Hello NicePage,
I am watching your progress and improvements. Indeed, the nicepage developers have made good progress.
I am also sure that the list of "wishlist" improvements is long. And, I also recognize that it is impossible to satisfy all "wishlist" suggestions. At the risk of adding another to your list, I will make a suggestion - to add a feature that was very helpful in the desktop version of Artisteer.
Artisteer allowed users to edit HTML at a page level and saving these HTML edits. In this way, users could insert HTML code within the Artisteer application. Admittedly, some HTML code did not show properly in the application preview mode, but did show properly when viewed in a browser.
The important part of this suggestion is that Artisteer was able to save pages and compile code with manual HTML edits anywhere on the page (head and/or body). Manual HtML edits were not lost and could be further edited within the Artisteer environment. It was a one-button click to view/edit HTML code at a page level.
This feature in Artisteer was significant because HTML functionality that was not natively included in Artsteer could be added (e.g. Custom php, Frames, videos, JavaScript, etc.)
Yes, I do recognize that NicePage has a "Custom HTML" block and many special needs can be handled this way. Yet, the Artisteer solution was much more attractive and offered virtually unlimited creative possibilities.
Since it will be impossible for NicePage to satisfy all HTML functionality, I strongly suggest that NicePage implement a "page level" HTML edit feature. Such a feature would dramatically advance NicePage's functionality.
Hello NicePage, I am watching your progress and improvements. Indeed, the nicepage developers have made good progress. I am also sure that the list of "wishlist" improvements is long. And, I also recognize that it is impossible to satisfy all "wishlist" suggestions. At the risk of adding another to your list, I will make a suggestion - to add a feature that was very helpful in the desktop version of Artisteer. Artisteer allowed users to edit HTML at a page level and saving these HTML edits. In this way, users could insert HTML code within the Artisteer application. Admittedly, some HTML code did not show properly in the application preview mode, but did show properly when viewed in a browser. The important part of this suggestion is that Artisteer was able to save pages and compile code with manual HTML edits anywhere on the page (head and/or body). Manual HtML edits were not lost and could be further edited within the Artisteer environment. It was a one-button click to view/edit HTML code at a page level. This feature in Artisteer was significant because HTML functionality that was not natively included in Artsteer could be added (e.g. Custom php, Frames, videos, JavaScript, etc.) Yes, I do recognize that NicePage has a "Custom HTML" block and many special needs can be handled this way. Yet, the Artisteer solution was much more attractive and offered virtually unlimited creative possibilities. Since it will be impossible for NicePage to satisfy all HTML functionality, I strongly suggest that NicePage implement a "page level" HTML edit feature. Such a feature would dramatically advance NicePage's functionality.
